From f7b55dd28ace8646068069a9cb49cb05347c6620 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Berteaud <daniel@firewall-services.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:07:42 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add MailSpike BL to spamassassin

---
 .../etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf/90MailSpike     | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 root/etc/e-smith/templates/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf/90MailSpike

diff --git a/root/etc/e-smith/templates/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf/90MailSpike b/root/etc/e-smith/templates/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf/90MailSpike
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..71bd866
--- /dev/null
+++ b/root/etc/e-smith/templates/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf/90MailSpike
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+# Spam sources
+header __RCVD_IN_MSPIKE eval:check_rbl('mspike-lastexternal', 'bl.mailspike.net.')
+tflags __RCVD_IN_MSPIKE net
+
+# Bad senders
+header __RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_Z eval:check_rbl_sub('mspike-lastexternal', '^127\.0\.0\.2$')
+describe __RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_Z Spam wave participant
+tflags __RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_Z net
+header RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5 eval:check_rbl_sub('mspike-lastexternal', '^127\.0\.0\.10$')
+describe RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5 Very bad reputation (-5)
+tflags RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5 net
+header RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L4 eval:check_rbl_sub('mspike-lastexternal', '^127\.0\.0\.11$')
+describe RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L4 Bad reputation (-4)
+tflags RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L4 net
+header RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3 eval:check_rbl_sub('mspike-lastexternal', '^127\.0\.0\.12$')
+describe RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3 Low reputation (-3)
+tflags RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3 net
+header RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L2 eval:check_rbl_sub('mspike-lastexternal', '^127\.0\.0\.13$')
+describe RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L2 Suspicious reputation (-2)
+tflags RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L2 net
+
+# Good senders
+header RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 eval:check_rbl_sub('mspikeg-firsttrusted', '^127\.0\.0\.20$')
+describe RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 Excellent reputation (+5)
+tflags RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 nice net
+header RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 eval:check_rbl_sub('mspikeg-firsttrusted', '^127\.0\.0\.19$')
+describe RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 Very Good reputation (+4)
+tflags RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 nice net
+header RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 eval:check_rbl_sub('mspikeg-firsttrusted', '^127\.0\.0\.18$')
+describe RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 Good reputation (+3)
+tflags RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 nice net
+header RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 eval:check_rbl_sub('mspikeg-firsttrusted', '^127\.0\.0\.17$')
+describe RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 Average reputation (+2)
+tflags RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 nice net
+
+# *_L and *_Z may overlap, so account for that
+meta __RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_LOW RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5 || RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L4 || RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3 || RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L2
+meta RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_ZBI __RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_Z && !__RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_LOW
+
+# Scores
+score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_ZBI 4.1
+score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5 5.2
+score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L4 4.2
+score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3 3.9
+score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L2 0.8
+score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 -0.5
+score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 -1.0
+score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 -1.5
+score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 -2.0